Freddie Mercury was the first closeted gay man to attain Rock God status. Many were shocked when he came out near the end of his life, since it was generally agreed a woman could get pregnant just being in the same room as his mustache.Just The Facts. Freddie Mercury's original name was Farrokh Bulsara, until he wisely decided to change it to something pronounceable by English speaking folks. Most homophobic sports fans would likely piss themselves if they took a moment to realize that the man who wrote 'We Are the Champions' did dudes.
Cirolana mercuryi is a crustacean named after Freddie Mercury. Because the first thing that comes to mind when you think of him would be crabs.The BeginningFreddie Mercury was born Farrokh Bulsara on the island of Zanzibar, known more for once being the world's leading producer of cloves (here's looking at you, hippies) than for pretty much anything else.
Also, it was the first place in Africa to have a color TV. In other news, there's not a whole lot of interesting things about Zanzibar.
The island was great at paying their most famous native back by, um, canceling a 60th birthday celebration because of Freddie's bisexuality. So, fuck you, Zanzibar.Ethnically, Freddie Mercury was Parsi, which means holy-shit-he's-technically-Asian. Which also makes him the coolest Asian in the Western world since Bruce Lee. This is a feat in itself since Freddie, to the best of anyone's knowledge, never went after another person with his fists of fury. As part of his upbringing, Freddie was raised Zoroastrian, an amazingly influential religion that likely inspired Judaism, Christianity and Islam, one of the first monotheistic religions, but most well-known to us as having something to do with the real-life 300.
After attending boarding school in India (because there's nothing more badass than a good boarding school), Freddie's family fled to England while Zanzibar was undergoing a revolution.After moving to England, Freddie enrolled in art school, where he would later put his talents to good use by designing the infamous Queen logo. The lions are after the leos in the band (Roger Taylor and John Deacon), the crab for Brian Mays' cancer sign and the fairies for Freddie's virgo. It was likely the only time Freddie was compared to a virgin, and the first of many times he'd be compared to fairies.
Sonic ass-kicking fairies, that is.Career (Freddie Mercury Blows the World's Collective Mind)At first, Freddie's career looked less than promising. After belonging to bands with absolutely horrible names like Ibex (presumably after that goat with weird horns), Sour Milk Sea (the worst smelling ocean ever) and an earlier incarnation of Queen called Smile (which is pathetic in the way it begs you to like them, like a lonely geek naming himself Chuckles actually, that's just creepy). Luckily, after the name change, Queen started to get successful, and Freddie was quickly becoming known as a great singer. He had a range of nearly four octaves. In comparison, Mariah Carey has five, but she blows hardcore and is too obsessed with butterflies to really count.Basically, every Queen song you know and love was written by Freddie: 'Bohemian Rhapsody,' 'Bicycle Race,' 'Killer Queen,' 'We Are the Champions,' 'Crazy Little Thing Called Love,' 'Don't Stop Me Now' and countless others. Never mind that these songs now are basically reduced to commercials for lame things like cell phones and cars; back in the day, they really rocked, man. He's basically one of the few artists whose music appeals to almost everyone: dumb jocks love 'We Are the Champions' and 'We Will Rock You'; pretentious drama kids deign to listen to non-Broadway 'Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy'; middle-aged women like 'These Are the Days of Our Lives'; dancers can't get enough of Queen's distinctively non-sucking stab at disco, 'Another One Bites the Dust'; and 30-year-old men who live in their parents' basement just keep playing 'Flash' on repeat.'
Bohemian Rhapsody' in particular seems to have left an indelible mark on the world's fabric. For a song about a homicidal dude, some Italian words (99 percent of which listeners don't understand), repeating the name of a Renaissance astronomer and then ends with a freakout and some pretty emo thoughts-not to mention it changes directions whenever Freddie damn well felt like it-it's pretty awesome that not only did it top charts when it was released, but it has been voted the best song of all time several times.
A rerelease topped the charts again in 1992, after that classic head-banging scene from Wayne's World. In fact, after that scene, it's likely the entire country went out and cracked their necks in attempts at recreating it.Freddie Mercury, with and without Queen, has worked with talented collaborators like David Bowie (Ziggy Stardust!), Michael Jackson (the King of Pop!), and Montserrat Caballe (uh. A successful opera singer noted for the purity of her voice!).
Of course, the most well-known of these collaborations is 'Under Pressure.' Before it became a shitty version by My Chemical Romance and The Used (sorry, emo kids), the original has been considered one of the greatest songs ever, with the most badass bass line of all time.Freddie's stage persona also played a significant part of the band's success. Dmv photo centers in delaware county pa.
'Stage presence' had to be redefined after Freddie, as previously it meant something along the lines of 'someone who could stand on stage, do something besides just standing there and not throw up all over the audience.' After Freddie Mercury made the stage his bitch and the audience his crowd of willing love slaves, just standing up there shredding an instrument wasn't gonna pull it. Plus, male vocalists the world over cursed themselves because Freddie changed the game there, also-before, with guys at least, all that was necessary was to be on key and in pitch with something (unless you were Bob Dylan, whose voice was apparently identical to a screeching cat).
After the aforementioned four-octave range of Freddie, mumbling some lyrics that don't even make sense when understood and even less when you 'sing' just didn't pass anymore. Basically, without Freddie Mercury, concerts would be way more boring.A great part of their shows included the costumes. From glittery unitards to short shorts to royal capes topped with a crown, Freddie could pull off anything.Well, OK, maybe not anything.That is a very hairy man.So it's really no surprise that Freddie Mercury has ascended to the Mount Olympus of Rock to join the pantheon of the gods.
Product registration/Activation Warning! According to User licence agreement you are allowed to install our software only on ONE device per. Convert Mapfactor Navigator 12 Truck trail version to full software. Download Mapfactor Pc Navigator 9 Truck Keygen with activation code. Mapfactor navigator 12 keygen software.
He could play the shit out of pretty much any instrument he wanted to-especially the piano-without even knowing how to read music. His voice could cause even the most stoic of men to give it up and cry. He redefined how concerts were done.
Mountaineer Cracked Rear Panel Problems September 27, 2017Own a 2002–2005 Mountaineer? Chances are your lift-gate is cracked. Complaints about cracked rear panels in that generation of Ford SUV’s including the Mountaineer, Lincoln Aviator, and Ford Explorer is one of the most commonly issues reported on CarComplaints.comOwn a 2002–2005 Mountaineer? Chances are your lift-gate is cracked. Complaints about cracked rear panels in that generation of Ford SUV’s including the Mountaineer, Lincoln Aviator, and Ford Explorer is one of the most commonly issues reported on CarComplaints.com.
A Manufacturing Problem?The crack is caused by the buildup of water and air behind the window panel over time. It’s more than cosmetic as some owners have said as the crack grows it allows water to enter the vehicle and soak the trunk floor.
There are even some reports of sensors getting fried from all the moisture. The wants Ford to cover the cost of repairs — which can be hundreds of dollars — saying the company knew about the problem during manufacturing, but kept pumping out the panels anyway.For more information about the problem and the lawsuit, visit.Ford redesigned their SUVs in 2002 and started using a polymer called ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) for their rear panels. ABS is supposed to be resistant to heat and tough impacts, which makes sense and points to a possible manufacturing defect causing the cracking.The automaker switched to a blend of plastics known as Xenoy in 2003 which, interestingly enough, has experienced cracking problems in. Not Just CosmeticThe cracks allow moisture to build up and corrode components that were supposed to be protected by the panels. Eventually, the cracks will allow the rear panel to break off while driving. Vehicles Affected MakeModelYearsFordExplorer,LincolnAviator,MercuryMountaineer. File Your ComplaintCarComplaints.com is a free site dedicated to uncovering problem trends and informing owners about potential issues with their cars.
Major class action law firms use this data when researching cases. Notify CASThe Center for Auto Safety (CAS) is a pro-consumer organization that researches auto safety issues & often compels the US government to do the right thing through lobbying & lawsuits. Report a Safety ConcernThe National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is the US agency with the authority to conduct vehicle defect investigations & force recalls. Their focus is on safety-related issues. Contact Mercury.
Mercury Xray
My ZMC software used to be (might still be) hosted on the computers at ANU. But I don’t know how long that will last!Therefore, this is a copy of that page, with the files linked to the RSC for now. If the links don’t work, let me know. OverviewConventional crystal structure refinement and solution relies on an analysis of the Bragg peaks, the sharp, well-defined scattering in a diffraction pattern. Is a suite of code for. If you don’t know what any of that means, there’s nothing to see here.
Binary distributionDownloaded OR into an install directory and unzipped.Opened a commandline window and cd’d to the directory where files were unpacked. C:WHATEVERTHEPATHIS cd ZMCWing95C:WHATEVERTHEPATHIS ZMC.exe -help2Seems to run.That’s it. Could have added the directory to my path.Downloaded OR and explored the documentation and the sample simulation included, but used the more current binaries.Also, went to and downloaded the paper and the simulation hosted there. It is a complete working example. I run Debian (currently 32-bit 9.4) on my getting-to-be-ancient Acer Aspire One Netbook (1 GB RAM, 250 GB HD).I wanted to install Mercury.(1) For a version that does not need a CCDC subscription, I went to.(2) Opened terminal, went to downloads folder: $ chmod +x mercury.and(3) Ran it: $./mercurystandalone-3.6-linux-installer.runAnd it installed (locally, no sudo) but when I ran it, it complained about i915dri.so and swrastdri.so and libc.(4) These files are on the system: find / -iname i915dri.so/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/i915dri.soas expected.
So where is Mercury expecting to find them? Or is there a versioning issue?(6) Found the directory with the binary in it and ran it directly from command line — $./mercuryWarning: mercury requires /lib/libc.so.6 but not foundlibGL error: unable to load driver: i915dri.solibGL error: unable to load driver: swrastdri.soWhy is it looking for libc in /lib? It’s on the machine, just not in there. Is there a way to tell Mercury where to look for files?(7) Ahh, stuff it; use a command line flag: $ mercury -mesaStill wants libc.so.6 to be in /lib; locate it and copy it into there; at least it gets rid of that error message.(8) Works.Good enough, anyway.
Email from InTechOpen asking for a contribution to a book chapter.Note how the list of institutions is empty!Dear Dr. Goossens,Due to your involvement in the field, and the research you published in your paper, “Synchrotron X-ray diffuse scattering from a stable polymorphic material: Terephthalic acid, C8H6O4,” IntechOpen invites you to extend your work and offer a more comprehensive overview of your studies. Contribute a chapter to “Synchrotron Radiation,” an upcoming Open Access book edited by Dr. Name Name.Work with an internationally recognized peer group and gain increased visibility for your published work.
Please visit the to register your interest.We look forward to hearing from you.Kind Regards,Marija Gojevic-Zrnic, from IntechOpenAuthor Service ManagerIt’s correctly written, their website looks more or less professional, their books do certainly get printed and distributed — I’ve seen them in proper libraries. They’re open about their (high in my opinion) fees — £1500 for a 16 to 20 page chapter. So are they predatory or just expensive? I guess they’re just expensive.I still would not publish with them.Why?Something like IUCrJ (fee of USD1300, or about £1000, so quite a bit cheaper) covers similar topics, is also open access, is part of a society publisher of high standing, has a reliable archiving policy and is embedded in all the major search engines and databases.
I have no experience with the editorial process at InTech, and it may be very good, I can’t say, but I do know that the IUCr process is superb, with their editors doing more than just farming out the material to review — they genuinely interrogate it themselves.The issue? IUCrJ might bounce the work! Also, book chapters are often more review-y and may not be publishable as papers.But if you are career-conscious, ask; will the book chapter collect citations anyway? Will it fall through the cracks of whatever research metric engine your bosses want to see quoted?
Sadly, this is the reality. Monographs and book chapters might be excellent and important, but will they be noticed?
I suggest finding a good-looking chapter or two from an InTech or similar volume and then checking its stats in whatever database you use for citation and impact metrics — Web of Science or whatever. Are the numbers reasonable? And so on.In the end, if you want to go open access, there are reputable journals that will take your money, and £1500 is enough to get into some pretty reputable ones. And conventional publication still exists. InTech might be OK, but check it out first and be aware of the options! Wrote a crude program to calculate X-ray, neutron and neutron magnetic diffraction scattering factors. IntroductionStrucFact or StrucFact.exe is a crude program to calculate expected intensities for neutron diffraction (magnetic and nuclear) and X-ray diffraction (in the version from 2013).
It is distributed as source code because any serious user will likely need to modify the source to make sensible use of it. It’s mathematics is essentially taken from Neutron Diffraction by and (see also ), and its mandate is limited; its job is to calculate F 2 for neutron scattering for arbitrary cells, magnetic or nuclear, and more recently for X-ray diffraction.It is `developed’ solely on an `as needed’ basis, which means I add `features’ when I need them to solve some problem I am working on. The inverted commas may seem gratuitous, but they are not!I am sure there are better tools out there for everything that this program does, and I advise against using it. There should be a README.TXT and the code itself distributed with this file.Please Note1. It does not work for incommensurates (unless you want to define an enormous cell).2. It treats every cell as P1 (i.e. You have to give it all atoms explicitly).3.
The nuclear and magnetic cells must be the same size, which means that if one is bigger than the other (usually magnetic bigger than nuclear) you have to put the atoms from the smaller cell into the bigger, including inserting all redundant copies of atoms.4. No corrections for intensities (e.g.
Not even Lorentz), no B-factors beyond the isotropic.In other words, it is remarkably limited. Why anyone would want to use it I do not know when FullProf and GSAS and the like are around. Having said that, it is quite simple (in the sense that everything has to be done explicitly, so it is laborious but not as conceptually demanding) compared to such programs, and the (minimally tested) code is here available. 2 CompilingThis is Fortran90 code that does not need any extra libraries. Gfortran is to be preferred.Non-static binary: gfortran -o StrucFact.exe strucfact.f90Please report errors in the code to /dev/null, although if desperate you can email me.Download from.
There’s a PDF inside the archive that gives more info. A new scientific paper. A tribute to the residual momentum of my scientific career, and in particular to Eric Chan, who has built on my work to come up with a way of exploring modulated molecular crystals.It’s pretty subtle stuff, but basically a crystal structure can show a periodic variation from cell to cell — for example, a displacement or substitution of an atom or molecule. If this variation is periodic, then it can be described using a periodic function. Such a function will have a Fourier transform that requires (relatively) few Fourier terms, and each strong term will give rise to a bright spot in the diffraction pattern. These spots will occur in a motif centred on (some) Bragg peaks, potentially adding many new spots to the diffraction pattern.So where these bright spots occur tells you about the modulation. However, in something like molecular crystal, the molecular structure factor may be relatively complicated, and so may the nature of the modulation.
This may mean that it is not easy to predict where the modulation spots are likely to be intense.Eric figured out a way to use my program to generate modulated molecular structures and then calculate their diffraction patterns. One of the most-viewed pages here (it’s all relative; still not very many hits really) is the. It’s a drop in the ocean, but it gets a few hits. Something else I’d like to bring all into one place, even though it’s been done elsewhere, is to summarise self-archiving polices. I’ll focus on the journals I’ve published in, preparatory to putting together a web archive of all my papers that I am allowed to self-archive (on my website and maybe on ). It’s really just a resource for me, but I might as well make it public.Some journals are open access; you don’t need to self-archive those, but usually you can.Some allow you to archive a proper reprint, processed and edited by the journal — like the IUCr, as shown below.Some suggest you archive the ‘author’s final version’ but don’t want you to put up anything with the journal’s imprimatur.Some say ‘mine mine mine’ and don’t let you host it at all.
I hope to make this clear.The page lives at, and so far has exactly one (1) entry, the good old, which has a very enlightened policy. They allow self-archiving as long as you use the official e-reprint, rather than just the downloaded PDF, and they request that you provide a link to the journal.
Seems very reasonable. The official e-reprint is easy to recognise; it has a distinctive front page with some official words on it, something like this (colours may vary). This paper and its deposited material explore clustering of 2 × 1 dimers (dominoes) subject to simple interactions and temperature. Much of the work in domino tilings has been statistical, combinatorial and thermodynamic in nature. Instead, here, the domino is used as a simple model of a non-spherical molecule to explore aggregation, rather as if the molecules were interacting in solution. As a result, the work does not look at how many ways there are to tile a plane, but at how the cluster evolves with different parameters in the potential that governs the clustering.
These parameters include the rules used to select which of the many possible dominoes will be added to the cluster, and temperature. It is shown that qualitative changes in clustering behaviour occur with temperature, including affects on the shape of the cluster, vacancies and the domain structure.The paper is on the web, open access, at. It comes with a bundle of software anyone can use to play with the model, modify it, whatever. Please do!It’s basically a toy model, but it shows some nice behaviour.
Maple 16 purchase code keygen download. Download crack maple 13 When Inspecting the Inside of Full Containers.
Apologies to the red/green colour-blind. In a very recent post, I mentioned an I rather like it. The appendix grew out of a little document I put together. That document is longer, vaguer and a little different from the published appendix, and so I am putting it here. Now, the article was written in, and this is a website, so I tried running htlatex on the file. It was very complicated: $ htlatex planes$ firefox planes.htmlAnd it worked. Next thing is to get it into WordPress Easy enough to cut and paste the HTML code into the window here, but what about all the graphics that were turned into png files?
Ah wellbit of manual fiddling. Equations and symbols seem to sit high, and some of the inline equations have been broken into a mix of graphics and characters still, not too bad.
Ccdc Mercury Crack
Planes perpendicular to vectorsSay you have a vector in real space, expressed say in direct lattice terms, forexample = p a + p b + p c where is the a lattice parameter, which is a vector.You may want the reciprocal plane(s) perpendicular to this vector.Why?Because correlations in a crystal collapse the scattering into features perpendicular to the direction of the correlation. In a normal, fully ordered three dimensions (3D) crystal, this collapsing happens in all three directions, so the scattered intensity coming off the atoms gets concentrated at points, the reciprocal lattice points, usually denoted hkl.If you have only two dimensional ordering, the scattering is collapsed down in two directions but not the third, giving rise to rods or lines of scattering in reciprocal space (that is, in diffraction space).
Mercury Update
If there are only one dimensional correlations, the scattering collapses into sheets, that is, it is delocalised in two dimensions and only localised in one dimension (because there are only correlations in one dimension).In diffuse scattering the crystal is typically long-range ordered in three dimensions, and the diffraction pattern shows nice Bragg peaks ( hkl reflections). However, there can also be disorder, for example in the motions of the molecules or the chemical; substitution of one species of atom or molecule for another.In a molecular crystal, one can sometimes identify a chain of molecules running through the crystal, and interactions within these chains are likely to be much stronger than those within. That tends to mean that the motions of the molecules along the direction of the chain (call that ‘longitudinal’ motion) is highly correlated, while it is not well correlated laterally.In such a situation, the single crystal diffuse scattering will show ‘sheets’ of scattering perpendicular to the length of the chain.Let’s say the chain of molecules extends along an arbitrary real-space direction, which we’ll define by the vector as above.Now, a plane perpendicular to can be specified by giving two (nor more) non-collinear vectors that lie in it. Let’s look at two vectors and we’ll call them and, for no good reason.Then we can say that(1)but note that we are not assuming ⋅ = 0, since right angles within the plane are not that important — especially as for generality I am not assuming orthogonal axes.Now, exists in reciprocal space, so it is a linear combination of the reciprocal lattice vectors, and like this(2)and these reciprocal vectors are defined in terms of the direct space vectors like this(3)and similarly for the other reciprocal vectors.
The important thing for us to note is that this means is perpendicular to. This is important when we go to take dot products later on. The bottom line here is basically the volume of the unit cell, and 2 π is just a scalar, so from the point of view of defining the plane that we want, these are not important.Ignoring the scalar parts, substituting eq. Gives(4)and since we have more variables than we need if we are to satisfy eq., we can arbitrarily set q c ⋆ = 0.Now, considering the dot product of and, in full it is(5)and this is useful because, to take the last term on the first line as an example, is perpendicular to ( × ) by the very nature of the cross product. This means that any terms with a repeated vector go to zero. Further, in the remaining terms the vector part is just of the form ⋅ which is the unit cell volume and a constant, which we can also factor out to be left with(6)which is nice and simple.
This is not a surprise but stillThe next step is to find another vector in that plane. This is just, and if we use the same logic but, to make non-collinear with, we choose r b ⋆ to be zero, we get an equation analogous to eq. These can be summed up as(7)where is a fairly straightforward extension.Now, in terephthalic acid (TPA), triclinic polymorph of form II, each molecule has a -COOH group at each end. These H-bond strongly with the groups on neighbouring molecules and you get strongly correlated chains of molecules running along the -111 (direct space) direction.
This then suggests that the planes of scattering perpendicular to these chains will extend in the directions(8)or(9)Now, does this work? Figure is some data from TPA, diffuse scattering data measured on a synchrotron. It also shows the reciprocal axes and the white, two-ended arrows show the directions of the diffuse planes and bycounting Bragg spots it can be seen that these agree with the calculation above.